On 16 September 2012 14:41, Zhi-Qiang Lei <zhiqiang.lei / gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Correct, in ruby, because ruby isn't optimised for funtional use.
>
> Interesting. Will it be?
>

I strongly doubt it, there's too much OO in the core for the language
to ever lean very far in a stateless (functional) direction.

-- 
  Matthew Kerwin, B.Sc (CompSci) (Hons)
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
  ABN: 59-013-727-651

  "You'll never find a programming language that frees
  you from the burden of clarifying your ideas." - xkcd