On 06/15/2012 04:11 AM, Ryan Davis wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2012, at 12:39 , Henry Maddocks wrote:
>
>> On 15/06/2012, at 7:07 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby / zenspider.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Without a commitment from the developer to take on these contributions, this call to arms seems like a waste of effort. It seems pretty clear that the author has been sitting on a lot of scanner contributions for ~2 years (many of which I could use right now) and hasn't done anything with them.
>> Fork it!
> I'm not against the idea... but as Yossef implied, it is clearly less effort to either get the original developer to recommit to the project or to delegate the responsibilities out to others.
>
>
Coderay seems to be well prepared for a plugin structure. The additions for the fortran scanner are very 
little: only one additional file + the extension of a single Hash (which is responsible for choosing a parser 
for files with a given extension).