On May 23, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Admin Tensor wrote:

> Ryan Davis wrote in post #1061894:
>> Making the assumption that requirements as stated are correct is what
>> dooms software to be bad. Using a 512 megabyte in-memory bitmap is NOT a
>> _good_ solution, it's just that it is one of the simplest solutions that
>> meets all the (ridiculous) requirements.
> 
> I think we just helped the original poster to handle the software 
> problem.

I'm not so sure that we helped.