Ryan Davis wrote in post #1061894:
> Making the assumption that requirements as stated are correct is what
> dooms software to be bad. Using a 512 megabyte in-memory bitmap is NOT a
> _good_ solution, it's just that it is one of the simplest solutions that
> meets all the (ridiculous) requirements.

I think we just helped the original poster to handle the software 
problem.  Whether the requirements are solid or not, I think it is 
better to leave it out to the original poster.

Regards,

Bill

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.