On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:59 PM, ruby rocks wrote:
>=20
>=20
> I just wonder if there is anything that I am overlooking, but I am=20
> pretty convinced that using less code is good from a security=20
> perspective, especially as it seems like I do not need all of the=20
> features of MySQL. Why include potential security bugs to get features=20=

> that I do not require?

Yep, you do overlook that widely used code is also less likely to have =
critical=20
bugs, because there were a ton of people thinking about exactly those =
issues
before you.=