--14dae93403fd7a7fa004bbf362e9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Tony,

It would seem to me that both are needed since a programmer would have
difficulty referring to a non-text specification. Is the specification
autogenerated from the context free grammar? I am rather unfamiliar with
the notion of an executable spec.

Regards,

Carter.

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri / gmail.com>wrote:

> It's impossible to know if a language conforms to an on-paper
> specification, because an on-paper specification is on-paper and therefore
> can't provide any way to check that a given implementation matches what has
> been written down.
>
> In order to do that sort of automatic checking, you need an executable
> specification of the language, which is what RubySpec provides:
>
> http://rubyspec.org/
>
> In my opinion, this makes RubySpec a lot more useful than an on-paper
> specification, which relies on end user feedback as they discover parts of
> an implementation that don't match what's written down. An executable
> specification can automatically tell you if you conform to it on a whim.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Carter Cheng <cartercheng / gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been wondering if there has been some updates since the
>> publication of the book by Flanagan and Matsumoto? I am curious how much I
>> can expect JRuby, CRuby etc. to still conform to this description? Is there
>> some sort of specification out there (similar to the Self specification or
>> the Scheme rnrs)?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Carter.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tony Arcieri
>
>

--14dae93403fd7a7fa004bbf362e9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Tony,<div><br></div><div>It would seem to me that both are needed since a programmer would have difficulty referring to a non-text specification. Is the specification autogenerated from the context free grammar? I am rather unfamiliar with the notion of an executable spec.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Carter.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Tony Arcieri <span dir="ltr">&lt;tony.arcieri / gmail.com&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">It&#39;s impossible to know if a language conforms to an on-paper specification, because an on-paper specification is on-paper and therefore can&#39;t provide any way to check that a given implementation matches what has been written down.<div>


<br></div><div>In order to do that sort of automatic checking, you need an executable specification of the language, which is what RubySpec provides:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://rubyspec.org/" target="_blank">http://rubyspec.org/</a></div>


<div><br></div><div>In my opinion, this makes RubySpec a lot more useful than an on-paper specification, which relies on end user feedback as they discover parts of an implementation that don&#39;t match what&#39;s written down. An executable specification can automatically tell you if you conform to it on a whim.<div>
<div class="h5"><br>

<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Carter Cheng <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:cartercheng / gmail.com" target="_blank">cartercheng / gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">


<div>Hello,</div><div><br></div>I have been wondering if there has been some updates since the publication of the book by Flanagan and Matsumoto? I amurious how much I can expect JRuby, CRuby etc. to still conform to this description? Is there some sort of specification out there (similar to the Self specification or the Scheme rnrs)?<div>



<br></div><div><br><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Carter.</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div></div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">-- <br>Tony Arcieri<br><br>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--14dae93403fd7a7fa004bbf362e9--