--0023544708e4fb37b604badbd42b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Intransition <transfire / gmail.com> wrote: > While there are obviously some files that will always remain (e.g. .git), > I wonder if it is possible for a convention to ever develop to mitigate all > this. Most likely that would be in the form of a common directory to hold > all these files, although conceivably, it could be in the form of a couple > of shared files --one for Ruby code and one for YAML. > I agree. It's insane not to have all configuration files in a "config" directory. But you can understand how it's evolved, and sadly it's not going to change. Gavin --0023544708e4fb37b604badbd42b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Intransition <span dir="ltr"><transfire / gmail.com></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div>While there are obviously some files that will always remain (e.g. .git), I wonder if it is possible for a convention to ever develop to mitigatell this. Most likely that would be in the form of a common directory to hold all these files, although conceivably, it could be in the form of a couple of shared files --one for Ruby code and one for YAML.</div> <div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>I agree. ¨Βτ¦£³Ή»ιξσαξε ξοτο θαφε αμγοξζιηυςατιοζιμειξ ¦ρυοτ»γοξζιη¦ρυοτ» διςεγτοςω® ¨Βυτ ωογαυξδεςσταξδ θοιτ¦£³Ή»σ εφομφεδ¬ αξσαδμιτ¦£³Ή»σ ξοηοιξτο γθαξηε®Ό―διφ <div><br></div><div>Gavin</div> --0023544708e4fb37b604badbd42b--