On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri / gmail.com>wrote:

> I think the real path forward here would be to propose that BigDecimal is
> loaded by default in Ruby 2.0, and to propose some type of literal
> representation for them, such as 1.1D that was suggested before.
>
> The thing that stops people from using BigDecimal right now is the
> inconvenience of doing BigDecimal("1.1"), and the output of BigDecimal#to_s
> and #inspect is difficult to interpret.
>

lol, reminds me of http://twitter.com/#!/tpope/status/160389717244915712