On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Abinoam Jr. <abinoam / gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Abinoam Jr. <abinoam / gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Magnus Holm <judofyr / gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 17:04, Adam Prescott <adam / aprescott.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 16:00, Sigurd <cu9ypd / gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7].inject(Hash.new(0)) {|res, x| res[x] += 1; res }
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think this is a misuse of inject, personally, every time I see it. It's
>>>> harder to read and it doesn't give the feeling of actually "reducing"
>>>> (inject's alias) the array down to one thing. The required `; res` is a
>>>> sign of that. Compare:
>>>>
>>>> [1, 2, 3, 4].inject(5) { |a, b| a + b }
>>>
>>> There's always each_with_object, although it's a little long:
>>>
>>>  ¨Â´¬µ¬¶¬´¬µ¬¶¬¶¬·Ý®åáãèß÷éôèßïâêåãô¨Èáóè®îå÷¨°©© üøòåóü òåóÛøÝ «½ >>>
>>
>> I think Magnus Holm is the clearest (IMHO, yes, it's just a taste and
>> humble opinion.).
>>
>> [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7].each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) {|num, hsh| hsh[num] += 1}
>>
>> Another way (not better) I remember is...
>>
>> Hash[ [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7].sort.chunk {|n| n}.map {|ix, els| [ix, els.size]>
>> See: http://ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/Enumerable.html#method-i-chunk
>>
>> It also can be... clearer?!?
>>
>> Hash[ [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7].group_by {|n| n}.map {|ix, els| [ix, els.size] }>
>> Perhaps something like this (same as Magnus Holm) just hiding the
>> complexity into the method.
>>
>> class Array
>>  ¨Âåæ ôïôáìéúåßôïßèáóè
>>  ¨Âóè Èáóè®îå÷¨°>>  ¨Âåìæ®åáãè äï üî>>  ¨ÂóèÛ >>  ¨Âîä
>>  ¨Âóè
>>  ¨Âîä
>> end
>>
>> [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7].totalize_to_hash
>>
>> Abinoam Jr.
>
> Some benchmark results...
>
> n = 100_000
> Benchmark.bm(15) do |b|
>  ¨Â®òåðïòô¨¢Òáìðè Óèîåéöåòº¢î®ôéíåÛ´¬µ¬¶¬´¬µ¬¶¬¶¬·Ý»
> result = Hash.new(0); a.each { |x|  ¨ÂåóõìôÛøÝ «½ ý» òåóõìô>  ¨Â®òåðïòô¨¢Óéçõò亢©  ¨Â î®ôéíå> [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7].inject(Hash.new(0)) {|res, x| res[x] += 1; res } } }
>  ¨Â®òåðïòô¨¢Ëåéîéãè £±¢© î®ôéíåÈáóèÛá®çòïõðßâùûüîüîý®íáðûüë> v|[k, v.size]}] } }
>  ¨Â®òåðïòô¨¢Ëåéîéãè £²¢© î®ôéíå> Hash.new(0).tap{|h|a.each{|n|h[n] += 1}} } }
>  ¨Â®òåðïòô¨¢ÍáçîõÈïìíº¢î®ôéíå> [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7].each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) { |x, res| res[x] += 1
> } } }
>  ¨Â®òåðïòô¨¢Áâéîïáí £±º¢ ¨Â î®ôéíåÈáóè> [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7].sort.chunk {|n| n}.map {|ix, els| [ix, els.size] } ]
> } }
> end
>
> user system  ¨Âïôáì  ¨Âåá> Ralph Shneiver: 0.290000 0.000000 0.290000 ( .259640)
> Sigurd: .320000 0.000000 0.320000 ( .289873)
> Keinich #1 0.560000 0.000000 0.560000 ( .497736)
> Keinich #2 0.280000 0.000000 0.280000 ( .250843)
> Magnus Holm: 0.310000 0.000000 0.310000 ( .283344)
> Abinoam #1: .140000 0.000000 1.140000 ( .042744)
>
> Abinoam Jr.
>

Sorry for the mess... (some error in the bench code + horrible text wrapping)

Apologizing with the gist...
https://gist.github.com/1624016

Abinoam Jr.