On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Adam Prescott <adam / aprescott.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 15:57, Intransition <transfire / gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yet, given some of the arguments, I wonder if using in-line comments along
>> with the super-concise version would not be a good "middle" approach too:
>>
>
> I think I'd rather just have the code speak for itself with meaningful
> variable names. Otherwise you're instead reading comments to describe code
> that could've described itself! Besides, in this case, :backtrace and
> :message give the same information as the comments.

+2

Cheers

robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/