On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Khat Harr <myphatproxy / hotmail.com> wrote:
> Concerning an attr for civ's, would it really be detrimental, though?

Do you mean an attr_accessor like method for a class instance itself?

> True it's something that would very rarely be used, but it almost feels
> like it's something that belongs there. =A0I guess what I mean is, if
> attr_accessor exists it feels to me like there should be a sort of
> class-level equivalent. =A0Maybe that's just me, though. =A0This has
> somewhat moved beyond my depth.

If you mean such a method then yes, that might be a reasonable thing to hav=
e.

Kind regards

robert

--=20
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/