------art_662_24848160.1323284201831
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary---art_663_9455258.1323284201831"

------art_663_9455258.1323284201831
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Wednesday, December 7, 2011 1:16:07 PM UTC-5, Quintus wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07.12.2011 15:08, Peter Zotov wrote:
> > Adam Prescott пиал 07.12.2011 18:05:
> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 14:02, Josh Cheek <josh.... / gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> I didn't, maybe it's being marked as spam?
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> I got one, but the email itself says that only a sample of the
> >> mailing list users received the email. The survey talks about
> >> developing Ruby itself, it seems, but I guess it's likely from
> >> ruby-talk not ruby-core.
> > 
> > Yes, it's from ruby-talk, and I wrote the author about the
> > (possible) misunderstanding. It seems like a terminology clash,
> > i.e. he has actually meant "Ruby community" instead of "project",
> > or something like that. I'm not sure through.
> > 
>
> I got this mail as well, but didn't had yet time to do any survey. Is
> it worth looking into or shall I rather ignore the mail?
>
> I suspect it's from ruby-talk as I'm not subscribed to the ruby-core ML
>

It seems okay. Some of the questions seem a bit odd, which is why I wanted 
to make sure it was for real.

I wonder if matz knows about it.



------art_663_9455258.1323284201831
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br>On Wednesday, December 7, 2011 1:16:07 PM UTC-5, Quintus wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1<p>On 07.12.2011 15:08, Peter Zotov wrote:<br>&gt; Adam Prescott пиал 07.12.2011 18:05:<br>&gt;&gt; On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 14:02, Josh Cheek &lt;<a>josh.... / gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; wrote:<br>&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt;&gt; I didn't, maybe it's being marked as spam?<br>&gt;&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt; <br>&gt;&gt; I got one, but the email itself says that only a sample of the<br>&gt;&gt; mailing list users receivedhe email. The survey talks about<br>&gt;&gt; developing Ruby itself, it seems, but I guess it's likely from<br>&gt;&gt; ruby-talk not ruby-core.<br>&gt; <br>&gt; Yes, it's from ruby-talk, and I wrote the author about the<br>&gt; (possible) misunderstanding. It seems like a terminology clash,<br>&gt; i.e. he has actually meant "Ruby community" instead of "project",<br>&gt; or something like that. I'm not sure through.<br>&gt; </p><p>I got this mail as well, but didn't had yet time to do any survey. Is<br>it worth looking into or shall I rather ignore the mail?</p><p>I suspect it's from ruby-talk as I'm not subscribed to the ruby-core ML</p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It seems okay. Some of the questions seem a bit odd, which is why I wanted to make sure it was for real.</div><div><br></div><div>I wonder if matz knows about it.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
------art_663_9455258.1323284201831--

------art_662_24848160.1323284201831--