--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:55:57AM +0900, steve ross wrote:
> Right. I got the order backwards.=20
>=20
> - Use "an" if it's not a "disputable" vowel %w(u y h)
> - else do a lookup
>=20
> Better?

Yes -- apart from the fact that "e" at least might fall into a consonant
niche under certain circumstances.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk667xwACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWNXQCgn/rhqnFF3A4/nigv/3Y52bcp
wzQAnj321zpzK6vXx/Lu2aVi+xiId+O3
=RKmY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:55:57AM +0900, steve ross wrote:
> Right. I got the order backwards.=20
>=20
> - Use "an" if it's not a "disputable" vowel %w(u y h)
> - else do a lookup
>=20
> Better?

Yes -- apart from the fact that "e" at least might fall into a consonant
niche under certain circumstances.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk667xwACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWNXQCgn/rhqnFF3A4/nigv/3Y52bcp
wzQAnj321zpzK6vXx/Lu2aVi+xiId+O3
=RKmY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----