On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 01:11:54AM +0900, David Alan Black wrote:
>   DISCLAIMER: I do not believe that reducing code to the
>   smallest possible size is always or even usually a good
>   idea.  However, I tend to learn a lot about Ruby from
>   this kind of exercise, and that's why I do it.

I fully agree, since:

>   def fft(v,n)
>      s,j=2**n,0

When I first read this, I read it as:

  s, j=2**n, 0

(which doesn't make any sense), but it really should be read as:

  s,j = 2**n,0

Not too confusing, but confusing enough to cause me to learn something.

Paul