Kendall Gifford wrote in post #1010836:

> If I were you I'd go ask the guys in the "Ruby
> on
> Rails: Core" mailing-list/group (
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rubyonrails-core) if you can
> expect
> the class to stick around (and/or why it's been nodoc-ed). After all,
> since
> your project is a rails one you're right to look to leverage this
> ActiveSupport class.

Thanks Gifford, i didn't know about this mailing list.

>>
>> I think by the way that the current ordered implementation of Hash is
>> nice, but should have been called OrderedHash, so that in future
>> versions Hash could be made unordered again.
>>
>
> Or it is named correctly and you can just assume a Hash isn't ordered
> (even
> if it is for a specific version) and code accordingly.

Yes, my "problem" is exactly that i did not want to assume Hash to be
ordered.

Alexey.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.