2011/6/21 Adam Prescott <adam / aprescott.com>:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc / aliax.net> wrote:
>> Is there any efficiente way? (I don't want the hast to be converted to
>> an array and the to a hash again).
>>
>
> I guess you didn't mind doing then? :)

Well, I wanted to avoid doing more stuff in Ruby, as using
Array#map/inject to generate a new Hash and so. But maybe using Hash[]
method directly is faster.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc / aliax.net>