On Jun 6, 8:08 ¨Âí¬ ÒéãèáòäÏîÒáéìó
<RichardDummyMailbox58... / USComputerGurus.com> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 10:47 ¨Âí¬ óåòéáìèå¼óåòéáì®®®Àçíáéì®ãïí÷òïôåº
>
> > [Note:  ¨Âáòôó ïæ ôèéó íåóóáç÷åòå òåíïöåôï íáëå éô ìåçáðïóô®Ý
>
> > before one can include a module into a program, one must first have said
> > module available... >
> WOW! It makes perfect sense!  ¨Âï÷ ôèáô ùïõ§öå åîìéçèôåîåíå ¨áîä ɧöå
> applied your advice to confirm its wisdom),  ¨Â§í áíáúåä ôèáô äéäî§ô
> see that simple statement in Pickaxe, Black's Rubyist nor in the
> multiple on-line posts I Googled.
>
> Thank you very much for that excellent response.
>
> Best wishes,
> Richard

Hi All,

I have to apologize: I said I checked Pickaxe and it failed to
indicate how to incorporate a foreign module in a Ruby app.

When I reread the Mixins section of Pickaxe vol 2,  it plainly
presented the same info that SerialHex generously offered in his post.

Best wishes,
Richard