On 6 =C9=EF=FD=ED, 13:20, Yukihiro Matsumoto <m... / ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: CORE - Altering Behaviour of "each do" (default param "it=
em")"
> =A0 =A0 on Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:00:29 +0900, Ilias Lazaridis <il...@lazarid=
is.com> writes:
>
> |Hypothetically, if a patch would have no performance losses and would
> |not influence behaviour in any way, would it be considered?
>
> It's not that easy decision before evaluating the impact to the whole
> language design. =A0But if those two assumptions were cleared, I will
> start considering it positively

ok, very nice.

> (but I still prefer "it").

The positive thing with "it" is:

* it's shorter
* it's used in another language (I rate construct adoption as a good
thing)
* can be read as shortform for "item".

.

--
http://lazaridis.com