--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:09:06AM +0900, Wilde, Donald S wrote:
>
> Jeez... BSD or Linux... or Doze?=20
>=20
> Enough already... back to our regularly scheduled Ruby questions! :D

=2E . . although, the editor question *does* have some relevance for people
who want some idea of the relative merits and failings of various editors
when they are assessing the best options for what to use while writing
Ruby code.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3mf10ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWGFACgtqOh/+4KGZn+ffIAl1Icysik
4EkAnjwM7vcRrTKaOfrTuSXqEXVWFZzZ
=Vgxe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--

On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:09:06AM +0900, Wilde, Donald S wrote:
>
> Jeez... BSD or Linux... or Doze?=20
>=20
> Enough already... back to our regularly scheduled Ruby questions! :D

=2E . . although, the editor question *does* have some relevance for people
who want some idea of the relative merits and failings of various editors
when they are assessing the best options for what to use while writing
Ruby code.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3mf10ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWGFACgtqOh/+4KGZn+ffIAl1Icysik
4EkAnjwM7vcRrTKaOfrTuSXqEXVWFZzZ
=Vgxe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----