--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 03:52:25AM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
> >
> > Given that Ruby appears to be switching to the BSD License with
> > version 1.9.3, I think that's probably an appropriate choice.  If you
> > basically mean that anybody should be able to use it under whatever
> > license they like
>=20
> Switched it to BSD.
> Good idea!

Thanks!  Now, if I write an article about it for TechRepublic, I'll know
what license to mention.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3NfsoACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXx9QCgl4WBSd9j4W7QpiH7OzkzE0IB
OGkAoIL1HGo97OjlrusozC11EuiZShm0
=shOO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 03:52:25AM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
> >
> > Given that Ruby appears to be switching to the BSD License with
> > version 1.9.3, I think that's probably an appropriate choice.  If you
> > basically mean that anybody should be able to use it under whatever
> > license they like
>=20
> Switched it to BSD.
> Good idea!

Thanks!  Now, if I write an article about it for TechRepublic, I'll know
what license to mention.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3NfsoACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXx9QCgl4WBSd9j4W7QpiH7OzkzE0IB
OGkAoIL1HGo97OjlrusozC11EuiZShm0
=shOO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----