On May 12, 2011, at 14:21 , Nikolai Weibull wrote:

> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 23:00, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby / zenspider.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>> On May 12, 2011, at 03:35 , Quintus wrote:
>=20
>>> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and =
now
>>> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors--as far as I =
know
>>> this wasn't the case with previous versions of RubyGems, because =
some
>>> days ago RedCloth installed without problems (no, no new release of
>>> RedCloth happened in the meantime). This causes the installation of
>>> RedCloth to fail.
>=20
>> Can we stop with the knee-jerk reaction to blame rubygems for =
everything including the national deficit?
>>=20
>> Rubygems calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.
>=20
> Was this really necessary?  Make the output clearer instead of
> complaining that people don=92t understand it.

I can't make the output clearer as I didn't make the output to begin =
with. Again, rubygems just calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.