On May 12, 2011, at 14:21 , Nikolai Weibull wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 23:00, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby / zenspider.com> = wrote: >=20 >> On May 12, 2011, at 03:35 , Quintus wrote: >=20 >>> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and = now >>> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors--as far as I = know >>> this wasn't the case with previous versions of RubyGems, because = some >>> days ago RedCloth installed without problems (no, no new release of >>> RedCloth happened in the meantime). This causes the installation of >>> RedCloth to fail. >=20 >> Can we stop with the knee-jerk reaction to blame rubygems for = everything including the national deficit? >>=20 >> Rubygems calls make/rake/whatever. That's it. >=20 > Was this really necessary? Make the output clearer instead of > complaining that people don=92t understand it. I can't make the output clearer as I didn't make the output to begin = with. Again, rubygems just calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.