On May 12, 2011, at 03:35 , Quintus wrote:

> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and now
> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors--as far as I =
know
> this wasn't the case with previous versions of RubyGems, because some
> days ago RedCloth installed without problems (no, no new release of
> RedCloth happened in the meantime). This causes the installation of
> RedCloth to fail.

Can we stop with the knee-jerk reaction to blame rubygems for everything =
including the national deficit?

Rubygems calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.