On 05/11/2011 02:47 PM, Brian Candler wrote:
> Robert K. wrote in post #997944:
>> Yes, but that was not the point.  I was explicitly talking about the
>> semantics of the argument to #find.
>
> You said: "here documentation is clear.  Why do so many people tell
> different stories if it is so easy to read this up in documentation?"
>
> And my answer is: maybe because the documentation is so poor.

Ah, OK *now* you said it.

> Your example demonstrates this, because ri doesn't mention about
> Enumerable#find returning an Enumerator, which is what the original
> question was.
>
> Admittedly, the errors are usually of omission, rather than being
> actually wrong. This particular one has been fixed in 1.9.2, but not
> backported to 1.8.7p299 (at least)

While we talk about omission: I really couldn't figure that from your 
first posting. :-)

Kind regards

	robert