--L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:55:22AM +0900, 7stud -- wrote:
> Gary Wright wrote in post #990058:
> >
> > It is quite clear that Ruby's string model is not at all like C's so
> > why should a particular string feature for Ruby be judged according
> > to C's semantics?
>=20
> ...because ruby is written in C??

Should Ruby's string model be like the Intel x86 instruction set's string
model, then?  It's turtles all the way down!

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

--L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2UEp4ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUsNgCeJozuaAJoi/sudSvKDWdeMkI5
7a4AoIrQeaggzJIXt2yiuoceRmpppNmX
=0gHp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4--