On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:24 PM, 7stud -- wrote:

> I might add, that *feature* is clearly a mistake in the ruby language=20=

> because C suffers from no such problems.


It is quite clear that Ruby's string model is not at all like C's so why =
should a particular string feature for Ruby be judged according to C's =
semantics?

Gary Wright=