On Mar 25, 2011, at 14:22 , Iain Barnett wrote:

>> Yeah. Well... I disagree. We really don't need extra magical syntax. =
I can almost guarantee you that this proposal would get rejected by =
ruby-core@, but you're free to ask.
>=20
> I find that a strange argument, applied across the language and a lot =
of what is regularly used would be binned. Aliases, attributes and =
method synonyms would all go immediately.

Well I'm not applying across the whole language... Otherwise we'd all be =
coding in assembly. :D