Gary Wright wrote in post #985859:
> This is not a correct interpretation of the 1.9.2 output.
>
> ARGF is an instance of a class and the class has the name 'ARGF.class'.
> That is a very unusual class name which makes it a bit difficult to
> interpret the IRB output.
>


Thanks for the correction...but I'll stand by my statement:

> irb just output what you typed in, which is not at
> all helpful.

Having a class actually named "ARGF.class" makes me think that ruby is 
an ass.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.