On Dec 14, 2010, at 16:30 , thunk wrote:

> Actually, I have to wonder if you read mine:   IT MAY GIVE YOU SOME
> IDEAS.

Well... my mind is blown. Obviously, for me to call you out for not =
having read the OP's email beyond the subject line, I'd have to read =
your mail to get an understanding that your answer has=20

  ##   #####   ####   ####  #      #    # ##### ###### #      #   #=20
 #  #  #    # #      #    # #      #    #   #   #      #       # # =20
#    # #####   ####  #    # #      #    #   #   #####  #        #  =20
###### #    #      # #    # #      #    #   #   #      #        #  =20
#    # #    # #    # #    # #      #    #   #   #      #        #  =20
#    # #####   ####   ####  ######  ####    #   ###### ######   #  =20
                                                                   =20
                                                                         =
  =20
#    #  ####  ##### #    # # #    #  ####     #####  ####     #####   =
#### =20
##   # #    #   #   #    # # ##   # #    #      #   #    #    #    # #   =
 #=20
# #  # #    #   #   ###### # # #  # #           #   #    #    #    # #   =
 #=20
#  # # #    #   #   #    # # #  # # #  ###      #   #    #    #    # #   =
 #=20
#   ## #    #   #   #    # # #   ## #    #      #   #    #    #    # #   =
 #=20
#    #  ####    #   #    # # #    #  ####       #    ####     #####   =
#### =20

with what he is asking.

On top of it, according to Hassan, apparently your algorithm is wrong. =
Good job!