On Oct 6, 2010, at 16:11 , Steve Klabnik wrote:

> The best solution would be to make the execution random, but the
> output in order.

that's not a bad idea at all... but it would be DAMN confusing if you =
did have test order dependency errors but couldn't see why you were =
getting your failures because they always showed up in sorted order... =
I'll have to think about that one for a bit.