I guess you could work only with modules and class methods, and avoid
instantiating any objects except Kernel, but it would be awfully ugly
and pointless exercise.

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Mike Stephens <rubfor / recitel.net> wrote:
> Often you see that Ruby can be object-oriented, functional or
> procedural.
>
> What would you expect to see in a program that made you say "Ah this is
> procedural Ruby!"?
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>