On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Mike Stephens <rubfor / recitel.net> wrote:
> Often you see that Ruby can be object-oriented, functional or
> procedural.
>
> What would you expect to see in a program that made you say "Ah this is
> procedural Ruby!"?

Statements and top-level methods, but no classes?

Jesus.