2010/7/15 Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail <xeno.campanoli / gmail.com=
>:
> On 10-07-14 11:17 PM, Arun Kumar wrote:
>
> This is my present, probably naive, belief:
>
> 1. =A0All programming should be as much functional programming as is
> practical.
> 2. =A0When you have to have side effects, make a class to hold methods ar=
ound
> the data. =A0That way you keep better track of it and you illustrate a we=
ll
> understood story of what you are doing, which makes it safer and more
> maintainable.
> 3. =A0Then keep refactoring to make as much functional programming as is
> practical.

Why do you say we should do as much functional programming -
especially in a language such as Ruby which is much more OO than
functional?

Kind regards

robert

--=20
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/