Hi,

Masaki Suketa wrote:

> Hello,
>
> In message "[ruby-talk:03617] Re: Embedding RubyUnit"
>     on 00/06/22, "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker / jump.net> writes:
>
> > > % rubytest myfile.rb      # Are you testing Ruby interpreter itself?
> > > % rubyUnitTest myfile.rb  # Too long?
> > > % ruby test myfile.rb     # Too abstract?
> >
> > These would all be OK with me, although I like "rubytest myfile.rb" the
> > best.
>
> % rbtest myfile.rb # Too criptic to confuse?

I think that is OK too, since every new Ruby user soon learns that ".rb"
means Ruby.

In fact, rb<whatever> might be a good general convention to follow for all
standard Ruby utility programs.

--
Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)