Robert Klemme wrote:
> 2010/5/31 Dimitri De Frenne <ddefrenne / gmail.com>:
>> Jeremy Henty wrote:
>>> I just noticed that both http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/ and
>>> http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/ advertise 1.9.1-p376, but
>>> ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ also contains ruby-1.9.1-p378 as
>>> well? ?Which is preferred?
> 
>> p376 is the advertised as the stable release, but I've been running p378
>> for some time now and don't have any problems with it. I can't seem to
>> locate a changelog about what changed specifically between those 2.
> 
> You can search for issues at
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-191/issues with filter on
> status=closed && "ruby -v" contains "ruby 1.9.1p378".  I find 13 bugs
> among them some segfaults.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> robert

Ah, thanks :).

Dimitri De Frenne

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.