Hi,

"NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" writes:
> > From: Conrad Schneiker
> > Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 4:33 PM
>
> > > > % rt myfile.rb
>
> > Would you all be willing to consider a somewhat less cryptic and
somewhat
> > more self-descriptive name for this?
>
> Yes.  Too cryptic to confuse myself in the future...
>
> % rubytest myfile.rb      # Are you testing Ruby interpreter itself?
> % rubyUnitTest myfile.rb  # Too long?
> % ruby test myfile.rb     # Too abstract?

These would all be OK with me, although I like "rubytest myfile.rb" the
best.

> % rubytest myfile.rb      # Are you testing Ruby interpreter itself?

I guess that depends on the contents of myfile.rb.

> > From: dave / thomases.com [mailto:dave / thomases.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 10:04 PM
>
> > I think that as a community
> > we should agree on one tool for documentation and one tool for
> > testing, and then use those tools.
>
> Sure.  It is time to write some code and test using RubyUnit for me.

Conrad