Mooffie n/a schrieb: >Arndt Roger Schneider wrote: > > >>Mooffie wrote: >> >> >>>(You believe the object graph DrX produces can be generated by existing >>>documentation tools? I'm not aware of similar tool(s). >>> >>> >>doxygen generates a similar [...] >> >> > >No, it doesn't. > >Doxygen, and similar tools, generate diagrams that are *not* suitable >for Ruby: > >* Ruby's object model is diagrammed best by using a grid where the >various lines of inheritance are shown orthogonal (in >parallel/perpendicular). That's what DrX does. Doxygen is good for >languages like C++ and PHP, whose class inheritance is mostly a tree. >Ruby's object model isn't a tree, it's a graph (and a circular one!). >And unless this is taken into careful consideration when generating the >DOT source, a very hard-to-read (and thus useless) diagram will come >out. The only reason people _might_ feel good with Doxygen diagrams is >because it blissfully ignores more than half of Ruby's object model (the >singletons hierarchy, and the run-time part). > >* In Ruby, much of the object model is generated at run-time. Static >diagramming tools are blind to this. For example, look at the DataMapper >diagram. Static tools like 'rdoc' can't tell us in which classes the >gazillion modules end up 'include'd. > > > > >As for GraphViz's SVG problem: > >I think I vaguely remember that the font names it puts in the SVG file >aren't standard ones. Perhaps fixing this will alleviate the problem. >I'll need to investigate this. I certainly want SVG support. Let me know >if you have more ideas on this and similar subjects. > >Note that I'm not using Tk's canvas to draw the graph. I show the bitmap >GraphViz produces. > > Send a medium to large compressed svg via email to me, then I take a look at it. I suspect the graphviz/svg issue can be solved inside the DOM-tree after graphviz generated the svg. -roger