On 19/03/10 at 06:27 +0900, gf wrote:
> On Mar 18, 11:47m, Lucas Nussbaum <lu... / lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> > [...]
> > Instead, we should try to
> > develop a set of good practices that make it easier to convert a ruby
> > library into a "normal" Deb or RPM package. Much progress has already
> > been done lately, and the last libraries I've packaged didn't use
> > "require 'rubygems'" except in the test suite, so they did not require
> > any patching.
> [...]
> 
> Perhaps talking to the gemcutter people (http://rubygems.org/) to
> bottleneck the Deb/RPM packaging needs would be productive? That's
> supposed to be the source for gems now, so building in a hook that
> does all the necessary tweaks for *nix packaging would tie Windows,
> Mac OS, gems and Deb/RPM together at the source. Just a thought from
> my tired ol' mind.

Yes. I will do that when we have a discussion about that on the Debian
side again (now is not a good time, we are trying to get a release out).
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas / lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas / nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |