Alexander Jesner wrote:
> On 02/22/2010 20:30, Benedikt Mller wrote:
>> Ruby is not the fastest interpreted language out there.
> If you have not already done so, switch to Ruby 1.9.

I have seen this claim that Ruby 1.9 is somehow faster than Ruby 1.8
repeated over and over again, but I have *never* seen any credible
evidence for that, neither in my own benchmarks nor in Antonio
Cangiano's (or any other, for that matter). Does anyone have any
evidence that this is actually the case? I would be very interested in
that.

jwm