>> Shouldn't the following be a syntax error?
>> 
>>>> ' 3' '4'
>> => " 34"
> 
> 
> Rarely seen, but string literal "implicit" concatenation has always been 
> a feature.

Yeah--for me it has almost always represented a bug (like a missing , 
between parameters or what not).
Ahh well.
-rp
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.