On 09.02.2010 00:20, Seebs wrote:
> I guess, to me, "foo"[1] should be an o.  If printing it yields a number,
> instead of the letter o, something has gone wrong.
>    
We agree on that. I've always thought ruby should have a Char class, so 
"foo" could
behave basically like a collection of Char. At least as far as [] is 
concerned.