Aldric Giacomoni wrote:
> Seebs wrote:
>> On 2010-02-08, Sonja Elen Kisa <sonja / kisa.ca> wrote:
>>> "foo += 1" somehow seems less elegant or pretty as "foo++".
>> 
>>> Is there any reason Ruby doesn't have ++?
>> 
>> Yes.
> 
> You know, I really thought the Ruby Way (tm) embraced, nay, espoused 
> DRY. I'm going to reference the earlier post.. Which referenced an 
> earlier thread..
> http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/vframe.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/349253?349080-351096+split-mode-vertical
> 
> There's -nothing- which needs to be said which hasn't been said in that 
> other thread.
> 
> I call this thread dead and buried, right on top of the dead horse which 
> has been flogged one too many times, and just to make sure no one 
> touches it again, I'll put the word 'nazi' and call Godwin's law on 
> myself.

...which doesn't work when intentionally invoked.  What are you, some 
kind of operator-Nazi? :)

Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
marnen / marnen.org
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.