Seebs wrote:
> On 2010-02-08, Sonja Elen Kisa <sonja / kisa.ca> wrote:
>> "foo += 1" somehow seems less elegant or pretty as "foo++".
> 
>> Is there any reason Ruby doesn't have ++?
> 
> Yes.

You know, I really thought the Ruby Way (tm) embraced, nay, espoused 
DRY. I'm going to reference the earlier post.. Which referenced an 
earlier thread..
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/vframe.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/349253?349080-351096+split-mode-vertical

There's -nothing- which needs to be said which hasn't been said in that 
other thread.

I call this thread dead and buried, right on top of the dead horse which 
has been flogged one too many times, and just to make sure no one 
touches it again, I'll put the word 'nazi' and call Godwin's law on 
myself.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.