On Jan 28, 2010, at 16:35 , bwv549 wrote:

> In other words, have Roger
> push his gem as 'gnuplot' instead of 'rdp-gnuplot'. Any objections to
> this?  This will allow Roger (and the community since Roger is open to
> pull requests) the ability to make some improvements to the 'official'
> gem.

what does it matter if people contribute to the "official" one, or to roger's fork? If they're contributing, they're contributing.