On Jan 26, 11:48 ¨Βν¬ Ναςξεξ Μαιβοχ­Λοσες Όνας®®®ΐναςξεξ®οςηχςοτεΊ
> So does Git.  ¨ΒζαγτΗιδοεσ εφεςωτθιξη Συβφεςσιοξ δοεσβυβεττες> Do yourself a big favor and drop Subversion entirely.
>
> This goes double for open-source projects: Git really was designed with
> the needs of open-source projects in mind, while Subversion was not.  ¨Β> shows.

I agree that on the whole git is better, but not in all ways.
Subversion has certain merits, including being a bit more intuitive
(IMO).

Believe me I would use git if I felt it fit my needs here. I was using
Darcs way back when. I enjoy the benefits of distributed VCS. But in
this case, where I have a bunch of little odds-and-ends that I want to
keep subdivided but within a single repo, svn fits better.