On Jan 26, 12:05 ¨Βν¬ Ναςξεξ ΜαιβοχΛοσες Όνας®®®ΐναςξεξ®οςηχςοτεΊ > Gregory Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser > > <mar... / marnen.org> wrote: > > >>> But I have a number of scrap projects, code snippets, > >>> explorations, and so on, that I want to keep in a repo, something more > >>> suitable to Subversion b/c it handles sub-projects well. > > >> So does Git. In fact, Git does everything Subversion does, but better. > >> Do yourself a big favor and drop Subversion entirely. > > > Git handles subprojects, sure... but it's arguable whether it does > > them *well* :) > > Is git submodule really any worse than svn external? To clarify, I wasn't referring to submodules or externals. By "subproject" I meant literally keeping multiple projects in a single repo. Subversion's advantage here is that a subdirectory can be handled as an independent unit within the whole.