"ts" <decoux / moulon.inra.fr> wrote in message
news:200203041055.g24AtgD10275 / moulon.inra.fr...
> >>>>> "P" == Paul E C Melis <melis / cs.utwente.nl> writes:
>
> P> Of course, it will take some time for Parrot to mature, but I wonder
what
> P> the future plans are for Ruby with respect to Parrot... Matz?
>
>  [ruby-talk:34594]
>
>  http://www.ruby-talk.org/34594

Right, it reads:

>From: matz / ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
>In message "Re: Ruby's Future"
>    on 02/02/23, Paulo Schreiner <paulo / bewnet.com.br> writes:
>
>|Another thing: is ruby going to have a VM, like perl's Parrot? Perhaps
>|even Parrot itself?.
>
>Rite will have some kind of VM.  It would NOT be Parrot, but I hope I
>can prepare backend API that makes Parrot backend possible.

I had seen this one, but I wonder about the development of ruby:
* Since Rite would be 2.0 and I guess bases on 1.8, what are the goals of
1.7 (which will become 1.8)?
* What are the major differences between 1.6 and 1.7? When I look at the
Changelog, I mostly see additions to lib/net and a lot of bug fixes (which
is good of course).

Maybe these are discussed on the japanese lists, but I wouldn't be able to
follow them anyway :-)

Regards,
Paul