Hello -- On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Lothar Scholz wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:02:23 GMT, Dave Thomas > <Dave / PragmaticProgrammer.com> wrote: > > > > >The latest RDoc in CVS (http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=42128) > >includes initial support for xml output. > > > > % rdoc --fmt xml ... > > > >The DTD is in the etc/rdoc.dtd directory. > > > > Why are you playing with this old DTD stuff. > > All new applications should use XSchema it is much > more readable and gives you more ways to describe the > semantic. And it is easy to learn :-) Interesting example of the relativity of readability, as discussed in recent threads. Give me a DTD over a Schema any day, exactly on that criterion :-) I wonder whether XSchema will get much support, given that there are various alternatives around. It looks to me like it represents the everything-should-be-an-XML document philosophy taken a little too far.... Whoops, I'm off topic. Ummmm, Dave, I hope you'll keep the DTD (with or without a parallel XSchema) in RDoc. David -- David Alan Black home: dblack / candle.superlink.net work: blackdav / shu.edu Web: http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav