On Nov 18, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:

> Mike Stephens wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Of course you can!  Why do you think you can't?
>>>
>>> Exactly.  The required file can contain anything - from zero to  
>>> multiple
>>> classes.
>>
>> If I put a class inside a method I get an error, so I assumed if I
>> insert code with the word 'class' in it, the same would happen.
>
> In that light, it's a reasonable assumption, but I don't think it's
> right.  require is not *exactly* the same as literal inclusion.  Have
> you had a chance to try it yet?

In fact it is very different from textual inclusion and it will only  
serve to confuse if you try to draw analogies to textual inclusion.

Gary Wright