Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
> Roger Pack:
> 
>>> ¡½ Shot, who¡Çs off to play with RubyToC now. :)
> 
> ¡Äand who can¡Çt, for some reason, get the canonical example
> from http://zenspider.com/ZSS/Products/RubyInline/ to work.

here's a working example (well worked once upon a time).

http://betterlogic.com/roger/?p=1849

The disadvantage to ruby2c seems to be that it only works for methods 
that "appear" to take floats and int [?]


> Checked it and it does seem to work under my hand-compiled
> 1.8.7-p202+r22308, but an attempt to install it under
> 1.9.1-p243+r22308 first ended in it trying to look for

Wow you're the first to ever even try it out besides myself.  Yeah not 
1.9 compat yet [sorry].
-r
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.