Dan Berger wrote:

> On an unrelated note, how did you generate that pretty backtrace
> information? Looks slick.

Hmm. Where is the slick backtrace again?

Joshua ballanco wrote:

> there are two
> improvements I'd love to see: 1. Filtering of Classes the same way you
> can filter methods. For methods, the search is nice for
> discoverability. 

Yeah I pinged mislav about this once and he said it was in the works for 
a future revision of hanna, so hopefully we'll see it (it's high on my 
own wish list, too, especially for core which has so many classes)

> 2. An
> across gem search. Honestly something like what ri can do across
> classes would be enough. When I see an unfamiliar 'zabraboof' method,
> instead of having to go back through the source to find what all gems
> were included at any point, it'd be nice to be able to go to Allgems
> and just search for it.

so this is just "search for method name x" and it finds the gem that 
contains it?

> Finally, as a sort of "out-there" suggestion... I got to thinking how
> nice it would be to have a sort of "personalized" Allgems page. What
> I'm imagining is a combination of some very basic (unauthenticated,
> even) account tracking on the web app combined with a gem plugin. The
> plugin would get a list of the gems installed on your system and push
> them to Allgems. Then you could log-in to Allgems and see only the
> documentation for the gems you currently have installed. Just an idea...

So this would be instead of the "massive list" a smaller list with just 
installed gems?
Would something unauthenticated and privacy invasive like
/username [you specify it] be enough?
Thanks!
-r
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.